Search Results for "rape charges"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "rape charges"

545 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 545 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Gang Rape and Abduction of Minor — Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical and Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the testimony of the prosecutrix, an 11-year-old girl, was reliable and sufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 366A and 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

24 Jun 2013

The case involves two appeals against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, convicting the appellants under Sections 366A and 376(2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt

16 Jan 2024

The appellant, Munja s/o Jijabhau Bhange, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rape and Atrocities Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Rape Under Section 376 IPC and Caste-Based Insult Under SC/ST Act Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

22 Dec 2014

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Rangnath Dagadu Shinde by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No. 177 of 1993. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Father-Daughter Rape Case: POCSO Act Overrides IPC for Offence but Greater Punishment Applies Under Section 42. The Court held that Section 42 of POCSO Act mandates application of law providing greater punishment, and High Court cannot enhance sentence without appeal.

2 Sep 2024

The appellant, Gyanendra Singh @ Raja Singh, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction for Rape and Murder and State\u2019s Appeals for Enhancement and Against Acquittal. Court Considers Circumstantial Evidence Linking Accused to Offences Under Sections 302, 376, 392, 201, 411, 414 IPC and Others.

8 Mar 2016

Criminal Appeal No. 516 of 2012 was filed by accused Jawedkhan @ Tingrya against his conviction and sentence. Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2012 and Crim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 2012. Appeal Challenges Conviction for Rape, Kidnapping, and Criminal Intimidation of Minor Girl Under IPC Sections 376, 366A, 506(2).

7 Aug 2017

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 410 of 2010, convicting the appellant/accused no.1 und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

6 May 2022

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Gautam Chandrakant Khairnar and Bhaiyya @ Sharad Chandrakant Khairnar against their conviction under t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

26 Mar 2018

The appellant, Shri Monappa Parava, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Udupi District, Udupi in S.C. No. 16/2016 for offences punishable u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

21 Dec 2017

The appellant, Mangesh Chandankhede, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Pena...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

1 Dec 2022

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Ajay Keshav @ Kiran Malekar for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)