Search Results for "railway stores"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "railway stores"

87 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 1007 of 2018; Appeal Against Conviction by Sessions Court. Appeal challenges conviction dated December 10, 2009 in Sessions Case No. 778 of 2008.

24 Apr 2025

This matter pertains to a criminal appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, instituted by the appellant, Eknath Krishna Kadam, challengin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in VAT Case — Revisional Authority's Order Set Aside for Lack of Proper Application of Mind. The Court held that the revisional authority under Section 64(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 cannot set aside a first appellate order without recording a finding that the order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue.

26 Jun 2018

The appellant, M/s Dhammanagi Property Developers, a partnership firm, filed Sales Tax Appeals under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not re-agitating merits.

9 Mar 2018

The case pertains to a review petition filed by M/s National Textile Corporation Ltd. and another (the original respondents) seeking review of a judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MCOC Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC is Indefeasible and Cannot Be Defeated by Subsequent Filing of Charge Sheet.

5 May 2016

The petitioners were arrested in connection with Crime No.172/2015 registered at Police Station Ajni, Nagpur for offences under Sections 307, 143, 144...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit Based on Will — Licensee Estopped from Denying Licensor's Title Under Section 116 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The court held that a licensee must surrender possession before challenging the licensor's title, and the Will dated 5.7.1991 was proved as a valid document of title.

4 Apr 2014

The case involves a dispute over possession of a suit property (Nazul plot No.18, Sheet No.7, admeasuring 235.09 sq. meters, with a double-storied bui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Domestic Inquiry Found Fair and Findings Not Perverse. The court held that the Labour Court and Industrial Court correctly refused to interfere with the dismissal under the MRTU & PULP Act as the inquiry was fair and the findings were based on evidence.

12 Mar 2014

The petitioners, R. Mada Swamy and Tanaji Yadav, were employees of Indian Express Newspaper (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. They were issued a charge-sheet on 7 De...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Returning Plaint in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held That Court Fee Valuation Determines Jurisdiction, Not Market Value of Property. Dispute pertained to suit for possession and mesne profits where trial court ordered return of plaint for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction based on market value, but High Court held that under Section 7(v) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, court fee is payable on the amount claimed as mesne profits, and jurisdiction is determined by that valuation.

7 Mar 2014

The judgment arises from three writ petitions filed by the defendants (M/s Vasudeva Rao & Sons and its partner) challenging a common order dated 12.3....

7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)