Search Results for "preventive detention"

706 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 706 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Case -- Daughter's Appeal Succeeds on Grounds of Insufficient Material for Public Order Threat

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal challenging the preventive detention order against Aruna Bai alias Anguri Bai under the Telangana Prevention of Da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows State's Appeal Against Quashing of Detention Order. High Court's Interpretation of Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 Regarding Detention Period is Erroneous.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against the High Court's order quashing a preventive detention order under the Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-Detention Challenge to COFEPOSA Order Filed by Wife of Proposed Detenu. Court holds that a pre-detention petition is not maintainable as the detention order had not been served and the detenu was not in custody.

The petitioner, Smt. Shanta Prakash Shewale, wife of Prakash Pandurang Shewale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a detention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...