Search Results for "presumption rebuttable"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kerala Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Statutory Interpretation. Sandalwood Oil Not Classified as Forest Produce Under Section 2(f), and Prosecution Failed to Prove Illicit Removal from Reserve Forest as Required Under Section 27(1)(d).

The appeal arose from a criminal conviction under the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, involving the appellant, a partner in a firm manufacturing and trading ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused Who Did Not Enter Witness Box. Acquittal Set Aside as Perverse; Accused Convicted and Fined ₹2,50,000 with Compensation to Complainant.

The appellant, Ivan Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Shivaji Tukaram Naik, by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Suicide Abetment Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty or Instigation. Conviction under Sections 306 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove harassment or abetment leading to suicide.

The appellant, Satishraj Ramteke, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abetting the sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Arises Upon Admission of Signature and Handwriting on Cheque and Promissory Note.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the original complainant, Mrs. Rosa Maria Fernandes, against the judgment and order dated 11.12.2008 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Despite Separate Trials for Multiple Cheques. Dishonour of three cheques treated as separate offences under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, but separate trials not resulting in prejudice.

The dispute between the complainant Nilesh P. Salgaonkar and the accused Deelip Apte involved three cheques issued by the accused to the complainant, ...