W.P. (MD) No.35806 of 2025
23 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "pension disbursement"
86 result(s) found
Found 86 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Medical Reimbursement Claim for CRT-D Implantation Under CGHS — Rejects Technical Grounds for Denial of Life-Saving Treatment. The Court held that denial of reimbursement for a life-saving treatment not listed in the CGHS rate list is unsustainable and directed full reimbursement.
3 Dec 2025The petitioner, Mrs. Ivy Miller Chahal, aged 75 years, is the widow of late Gurmail Singh Chahal. She filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227...
- 134
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Tribunal's use of multiplier '13' for a 61-year-old claimant was contrary to Sarla Verma v. DTC guidelines; correct multiplier is '9'.
26 Nov 2024The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated ...
- 135
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.
23 Aug 2024The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...
- 616
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not re-agitating merits.
9 Mar 2018The case pertains to a review petition filed by M/s National Textile Corporation Ltd. and another (the original respondents) seeking review of a judgm...
- 62
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIRs Against Former Chief Minister in BDA Denotification Case — CAG Report Cannot Be Sole Basis for Criminal Prosecution Without Independent Investigation. The court held that the CAG report is not a conclusive proof of criminality and cannot be the foundation for criminal prosecution without independent investigation, and that the FIRs were registered without proper sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
5 Jan 2016The petitioner, Shri B.S. Yeddyurappa, a former Chief Minister of Karnataka, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...
- 63
