Search Results for "pecuniary advantage"

231 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 231 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Rejecting Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Service Termination Suit. Plaintiff's Cause of Action Arose at Nagpur Where She Worked and Was Terminated, Conferring Jurisdiction on Nagpur Courts Under Section 20(c) CPC.

The respondent/plaintiff, Mrs. Archana Dongre, was employed as a Relationship Manager with HDFC Bank Limited at its Nagpur branch. Her services were t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Sarpanch Disqualified for Taking Illegal Commercial Water Connection Without Sanction.

The petitioner, Ramdas Dattaraya Khose, was an elected member and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Padalidariya. Respondents 7 to 9 filed an application und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arvind Kejriwal Challenges Legality of Arrest Under PML Act: Delhi High Court Appeal. Examining Judicial Safeguards and Proportionality in Arrest Procedures

This appeal, filed by Arvind Kejriwal, challenges the legality of his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Preventio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Transfer of MCOC Case to Sessions Court for Lack of Jurisdiction — Offence Not Under MCOC Act. Special Court Correctly Found No Organized Crime Syndicate or Continuing Unlawful Activity Under Section 2(1)(e) and Section 3 of MCOC Act.

The case involves two appeals against an order dated 7th October 2011 passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in CBI Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Directors of Companies Cannot Be Prosecuted Without Prior Sanction as They Were Public Servants Under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves two criminal revision applications filed by directors of companies against whom the CBI had initiated prosecution. The applicants we...