Search Results for "notice before mutation"

730 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Civil Suit Pending Before Civil Court Must Be Decided First. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Revenue Authorities Directed to Await Civil Court Decision.

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a mutation entry made in the revenue records in favor of the respondents. The dispute pertained to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Case — Dispute Over Inheritance and Partition Requires Civil Suit. Mutation entries do not confer title; revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Hanumant Baburao Neharkar, Anand Baburao Neharkar, and Baburao Baban Neharkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Chandrakant Nivrutti Pagar, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge (Anti Corruption), Nashik for offences under Sections 7, 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Refusing Mutation in Land Revenue Dispute — Petitioners' Title and Possession Upheld Despite Alleged Government Land. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Tahsildar Must Hear Parties Before Refusing Mutation Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioners, Smt. R. Suguna and Siddarth Sarnaik, purchased 8 acres of land in Sy.No.42 of Navarathna Agrahara, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim exclusive possession of joint family property without partition and that a suit for possession without seeking partition is not maintainable.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a civil suit for possession filed by the original plaintiffs (now appellants) against the defendants...