Search Results for "money order refusal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "money order refusal"

1237 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1237 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Recovery of Money — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

29 Nov 2024

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging SAFEMFOPA Forfeiture Orders — Upholds Appellate Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay. The court held that the Appellate Tribunal under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 has no power to condone delay beyond the statutory period of 60 days.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Appellate Trib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision of Examination Order in Civil Suit — Right to Begin Evidence Not Absolute. Order 18 Rule 1 CPC permits court to direct which party shall begin, but such order can be reconsidered if circumstances change or if earlier order was passed without hearing the other side.

1 Nov 2018

The petitioners, original defendant nos.1, 2, and 3 in Regular Civil Suit No.273/2013, challenged the order dated 15.10.2018 passed by the Civil Judge...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging SFIO Investigation Order in Company Law Non-Compliance Case Involving Family Demerger Dispute. The Court considered whether order dated 6 May 2016 directing investigation into affairs of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited under Section 633 and Article 226 should be quashed amid ongoing litigation.

5 Oct 2016

The writ petition was filed by majority shareholders of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited, a Kolkata-based sponge iron manufacturer, against the Add...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Over Bank Guarantee Validity - High Court's Direction to Substitute Bank Guarantee Set Aside as Appellant Complied with Original Order for Scheduled Bank Located in India Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions filed by SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation against Pow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Between Parents and Son — Orders Compliance with Consent Terms for Possession and Mesne Profits. Court holds that consent terms recorded in earlier proceedings are binding and executable, and that the trial court erred in dismissing the application for compliance without considering the binding nature of the consent order.

11 Oct 2018

The appellants, Nandlal Kewalramani and Shobhadevi Kewalramani, are the parents of respondent No.1, Rajesh Nandlal Kewalramani. The dispute pertains t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Tender Cancellation Case — Violation of Natural Justice as Contractor Not Heard Before Termination of Contract. The Court Held That Principles of Natural Justice Require a Hearing Before Cancelling a Contract Awarded Through Tender, Even If Financial Irregularities Are Alleged.

11 Dec 2020

The case involves appeals by the State of Uttar Pradesh against a High Court judgment that set aside the cancellation of a contract awarded to Sudhir ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)