Search Results for "minor prosecutrix"

374 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 374 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age — Benefit of Doubt Given as Prosecution Failed to Establish Minority of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 4, 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashik Ramjan Ansari, was convicted by the Special Judge at Greater Bombay in POCSO Special Case No.203 of 2016 for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration Lead to Upholding of Acquittal Under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused (XYZ) for offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape.

The appellant, Sunil Kashinath Shelke, was convicted by the learned District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.41 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 363, 376, 506, 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Age of Victim and Relied on Unreliable Sole Testimony.

The case involves an appeal against conviction for offences under Sections 363, 376, 506 and 342 IPC. The appellant, Dada Laxman Gaikwad, was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Consent-Based Sexual Relationship Not Rape Under Section 375 IPC as Promise of Marriage Was Not False from Inception.

The appellant, Amit Shende, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Medical Evidence and Victim's Testimony Sufficient. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 of POCSO Act Confirmed as Prosecution Proved Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sandip s/o Atmaram Khandekar, was convicted by the Special Court at Warora for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and POCSO Act. Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Ranjit Ghutke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the rape of a 13-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consent. Prosecutrix's Age Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused Under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Sanjay Jagannath Ursal, was convicted by the IV Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on June 30, 2003 in Sessions Case No.210 of ...