Search Results for "lease purpose"

2493 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2493 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Directing Indemnity for Depreciation Disallowance. Petitioners Argue that Clause 14 of Lease Agreement Does Not Cover Income Tax Depreciation Denial and Rely on Identical Clause Interpretation in Prior Judgment.

The dispute arose from a lease agreement executed in 1997 between Borosil Glass Works Limited (lessee/petitioner) and Tata Motors Limited (lessor/resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's rejection of claim for extension of lease, finding no error of law or jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Prajapati Gunvant Keshavlal, was engaged in loading and unloading goods from railway wagons. On 11th June 2009, the respondent, Union ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Lease Dispute — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction as Lease Expired and Possession Was Not Proven.

The petitioner, M/s. Meher Farms Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Adhoc District Judge-1 (FTC) North Goa, Panaji, dated 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows SIPCOT's Appeal in Sub-Leasing Dispute — Demand for Sub-Leasing Charges Upheld. Lease Agreement Clause 2(vii) Prohibiting Sub-Leasing Without Consent and Requiring Payment of Charges is Valid and Enforceable.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT) against orders of a learned Single J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines

The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...