Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

611 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 611 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant's Title and Possession Over Land Not Extinguished by Acquisition Proceedings. The court held that the appellant had locus standi to challenge the acquisition and that the delay was not fatal as possession continued.

14 Jul 2026

The appellant, Sri V Sreenivasaiah, filed a writ appeal against the order dated 25.02.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 2228/2022, w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

2 Jan 2025

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Liability for Supplementary Award Rests with Original Beneficiary, Not Transferee Company. Scheme of Arrangement Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 Does Not Transfer Contingent Liabilities of Pending Acquisition Proceedings.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. against the order of the Himachal Pradesh High Court dated 12.07.2022. The Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Land from Reservation for Primary School Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 — Landowner's Withdrawal of Consent for TDR Valid Due to Acquiring Body's Delay. The court held that the land reserved for a primary school stood released from reservation as the acquiring body failed to acquire the land within the statutory period, and the landowner's withdrawal of consent for TDR was valid due to the acquiring body's delay.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gut No. 114 in Village Pimprala, Jalgaon, within the municipal limits of Jalgaon Municipal Corporation, sought...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Petitions for Katkari Tribe Members Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Held That Landowners Are Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 26(1)(b) and Solatium Under Section 30(1) of the Act, and That the Acquisition Proceedings Were Not Vitiated by Non-Compliance with Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

11 Jan 2024

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by members of the Katkari Scheduled Tribe and other landowners challenging the compensation awarde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions for Enhanced Compensation and Apportionment in Land Acquisition Matter. Petitioner, as legal heir, entitled to enhanced compensation under Sections 26-30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 24(1)(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

24 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Faizal Ismail Sutar, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. In Writ Pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Deemed Lapse of Land Reservation for High School and Playground Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966. Failure to Acquire Land Within Prescribed Period Results in Lapse of Reservation and Entitlement to Develop Land as Per Adjacent Permissible Use.

23 Sep 2014

The petitioners, four private limited companies, owned a plot of land bearing Survey No.42/1+2/2/5 admeasuring 7652 sq. meters at Nashik. The land was...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Deemed Lapse of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act - Petitioners Entitled to Develop Land as Reservation Not Acquired Within Reasonable Time. The court held that the reservation of land for vegetable market and shopping centre and parking had lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, as the acquiring authority failed to acquire the land within a reasonable period.

23 Sep 2014

The petitioners, owners of a plot of land bearing Survey No.42/1+2/2/5 admeasuring 6796 sq. meters at Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pune Municipal Corporation's Revision Against Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation upheld as based on evidence and within its jurisdiction under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The Pune Municipal Corporation filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)