Search Results for "judicial expertise"

471 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 471 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4761 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Removal of Reference to Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale from State Textbooks. Court holds that the reference is a factual historical statement and does not glorify violence or offend any religious sentiments.

The petitioner, Amritpal Singh Khalsa, a law student, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020032022013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Toll Road Tender and Concession Period. Policy decisions regarding toll collection and concession periods are not subject to judicial review unless arbitrary or mala fide.

The petitioner, Nandu Sambaji Nagarkar, a social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.

Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...