Search Results for "joint venture"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "joint venture"

407 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Accumulated Input Tax Credit Under Inverted Duty Structure in GST — Rejection by Authorities Set Aside. Held that refund of unutilized ITC is admissible under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017 even when output supply is partially exempt, and that the formula under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 must be applied correctly.

23 Apr 2026

The petitioner, CHEC-TPL Line 4 Joint Venture, a joint venture between TATA Projects Limited and another entity, was engaged in the construction of a ...

Supreme Court

Legal Battle Over Insurance Claim: NCDRC Decision Challenged Navigating the complexities of insurance law and contract disputes in the wake of a construction project gone awry.

16 May 2024

Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Insurance Law; Contract Law; Construction Contract Dispute The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application for Injunction in Copyright Dispute Over Documentary Film 'Sindhustan' — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case of Co-Producer or Joint Copyright Ownership. The Court held that an oral agreement for co-production is not sufficient to claim joint ownership of copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957, and that the Plaintiff's contributions did not amount to joint authorship.

11 Feb 2021

The suit was filed by Kabir Singh Chowdhry (Plaintiff) against Sapna Moti Bhavnani (Defendant No. 1) and others, seeking a declaration that the Plaint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitral Award Challenge — No Automatic Stay Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act Without Strong Prima Facie Case. Court holds that mere filing of Section 34 petition does not warrant stay; applicant must demonstrate irreparable harm and balance of convenience.

14 Dec 2020

The judgment concerns an interim application filed by Kishor N Shah and others (the Shahs) under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited in Doctrine of Mutuality Case — Surplus from AMP Activities Held Taxable as Income. Contributions from Non-Beneficiaries and Lack of Complete Identity Between Contributors and Beneficiaries Defeats Claim of Mutuality Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

24 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited (YRMPL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Yum! Restaurants (India) Pv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.

16 Oct 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Foreign Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — Seat of Arbitration Determined as London, Not India. Parties' Choice of English Law and London Arbitration Excludes Indian Courts' Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Sakuma Exports Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, entered into a contract dated 12 January 2010 with the respondent, Louis Drefus Commoditi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Suit by Guarantor for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell. Guarantor's right to sue for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property is maintainable under Section 15(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, as a person who has paid consideration and is in possession can enforce the contract.

10 Jan 2005

The petitioners, M/s Bamco Tech Pvt. Ltd. and M/s S.M. Computers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of their application under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Frustrated by Non-Commencement of Construction. Court holds that time was not of the essence in an agreement for sale of a flat under construction, and the purchaser's readiness and willingness must be assessed at the time of performance.

30 Nov -0001

The appellants, Jugraj K. Ranka, Ramesh K. Ranka, and Suresh K. Ranka, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 15th June ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)