Search Results for "investigation detention period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "investigation detention period"

643 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 643 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Homestay Owner in Sexual Assault Case Involving Foreign National; Declares Arrest Illegal and Awards Compensation. Arrest Under Non-Cognizable Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Without Cognizable Offence or Proper Procedure Held Violative of Fundamental Rights.

15 Jul 2026

Background: The petitioner, Palecanda Ponnappa @ Vishal, the owner of Devi Villa Homestay in Kodagu district, was arrested in connection with an alleg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Accused in Gambling Cases — Acts Constitute Law and Order, Not Public Order. Offences under Section 65(D) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 for gambling do not affect public order, and delay in considering representation vitiates detention under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

6 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Jumma @ Munna Burhan Hiriwale, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

27 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and bail status, vitiating the preventive detention order.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Firoz @ Babali Makbul Khan, challenged the detention order dated 6th September 2022 passed by the Commissioner of P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Extension Orders and Grants Default Bail to Accused in Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act Case Due to Procedural Violation. The Court held that production of accused before the Special Court when considering Public Prosecutor's report for extension of investigation period under Section 20(2) of the 2015 Act is mandatory, and non-compliance renders extension orders illegal, entitling accused to default bail under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

23 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by accused persons charged under the Gujarat Control of T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Holding That Bail in Original FIR Does Not Cover Newly Added UAPA Offences and NIA Re-Registration Is Not a Second FIR. The court ruled that the appellant must seek fresh bail for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and that the NIA's re-registration and further investigation were lawful.

26 Apr 2019

The appellant, Pradeep Ram, was initially arrested in connection with FIR No. 02/2016 registered at Police Station Tandwa for offences under Sections ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay — Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated by Casual Approach. Delay of 9 months between incident and detention order held to vitiate the subjective satisfaction under MPDA Act.

15 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Aalam Yosuf Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 15 September 2017 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquitted Accused's Writ Petition for Rs.200 Crore Compensation as Acquittal Does Not Automatic Entitlement. The Court Holds That Compensation Under Article 226 Requires Proof of Malicious Prosecution and Violation of Fundamental Rights, Not Mere Acquittal.

5 May 2017

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by the peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions for Premature Release of Life Convicts in NDPS Act Cases — Held That Detention Beyond 14 Years Without Consideration of Remission Is Illegal. The court directed the state to consider premature release under the remission policy dated 10.02.2010 and Section 433A CrPC.

13 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Bandu Shivaji More, Prashant Krushandev Jadhav, and Satyawan Mahadev Suryavanshi, were convicted for offences under the Narcotic Drug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in Essential Commodities Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Proximate Link. Preventive Detention Under Section 3(2) of Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Order and There Was Unexplained Delay.

6 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Ravindra Prakash Nikam, challenged an order of detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, on 1 March 2011 under Section ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)