Search Results for "intervener"

263 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 263 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Bank Entitled to Recover Debt Under RDB Act. DRT Has Inherent Power to Reject Frivolous Counterclaim Without Recording Evidence, and High Court Should Not Interfere When Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Arguments on Constitutional Validity of Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1984 — Matter Remains Undecided in Provided Text. Petitioner Contended Act Lacked Nexus with Directive Principles and Was Not Protected Under Article 31C.

The petitioners, M/s Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of the Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Circus to Perform with Animals Subject to Registration and Animal Welfare Conditions. Performing Animals Rules, 1973 require registration but interim relief granted to avoid irreparable loss.

The petitioner, Choice Events & Trade Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was entrusted with organizing shows of the Russ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against MSRTC Contract Termination Due to Breach of Contractual Obligations. Court Holds That Article 226 Jurisdiction Cannot Be Ousted by Agreement, But Petitioner Failed to Show Arbitrariness or Unreasonableness in Termination.

The petitioner, M/s S.K. Translines Pvt. Ltd., was awarded a work order by Respondent No. 5 (General Manager (Traffic), MSRTC) for carrying out the bu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Government Resolutions Granting Protection to Employees with False Tribe Certificates. Petitioners Argue That Such Resolutions Violate Constitutional Provisions and Statutory Mandate Regarding Withdrawal of Benefits Obtained Through False Certificates.

The petitioner, an advocate and president of the Tribal Rights Protection Committee, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging th...