Search Results for "injunction flat occupation"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Stays Eviction of Daughter-in-Law from Matrimonial Home in Property Dispute with In-Laws. Trial Court's Order at Notice of Motion Stage Held to Be in Nature of Final Decree; Right to Residence Under Domestic Violence Act Recognized.

The appellant, Bharati Rajesh Bhave, filed an appeal against an order passed by the trial judge on 3rd October 2015, which allowed a notice of motion ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Forcible Dispossession. Plaintiff Proved Prior Possession and Forcible Ouster by Defendant with Armed Men, Entitling Him to Summary Remedy Without Proof of Title.

The plaintiff, Om Nath Chudamani Sharma, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of possession of Flat No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Suit Challenging Transfer of Flat by Executors Before Probate. The court set aside the trial court's order appointing a Receiver and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of balance of convenience.

The appeals arose from an order dated 13 March 2014 of the learned Trial Judge in a notice of motion taken out by the plaintiffs in a suit seeking to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Due to Pending Title Dispute. Availability of Alternate Civil Suit Remedy Renders Writ Petition Under Article 227 Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s. Blue Heaven Co-op Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction Bank Guarantee Invocation in Development Dispute. Court holds that bank guarantee is an independent contract and injunction can only be granted on grounds of fraud or irretrievable injustice, not mere breach of underlying contract.

The appeal arose from a commercial suit where the appellant, Kryshnajay Developers Pvt. Ltd., sought a temporary injunction to restrain the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Court Receiver Appointed to Protect Suit Premises Pending Trial. Dispute Involves Alleged Illegal Dispossession of Widow and Minor Son from Residential Flat and Office Premises by In-Laws.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan and her minor son Raghib Ibrahim Khan (appellants) against Asadullah Khan and others (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Will Validity — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Appoint Receiver and Grant Injunction. Court Held That Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Execution of Will Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Order 39 CPC.

The case involves a property dispute among family members concerning the estate of the deceased, Girdharilal T. Bijlani. The appellants (original plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...