Search Results for "incamera statements"

95 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Furnishing of Vital Documents. Failure to provide injury certificates of all injured persons in a solitary incident vitiates subjective satisfaction of detaining authority.

The petitioner, Monty Bahadur Karotiya, challenged his detention order dated 02.02.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Act Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Grant of Bail and Inadequate Material to Establish 'Habitual' Bootlegger

The petitioner, Kashinath Motiram Chavan, challenged a detention order dated 23 March 2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Tribal Girl under POCSO Act and IPC. Circumstantial evidence including DNA, last seen, and medical evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the brutal rape and murder of a 10-year-old tribal girl, Ku. S, on 15-08-2015 at the newly constructed hostel building of Adivasi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Maharashtra Police Act Case. Appellate Authority Failed to Properly Consider Witness Statements and Absence of Conviction, Leading to Remand for Fresh Adjudication.

The petitioner challenged an externment order passed under the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, externing him from Aurangabad district for two years. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. The Court Held That a 19-Day Gap Between Passing and Service of Detention Order Without Explanation Violates the Detenu's Right to Make a Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Vishnu @ Bablu Vasant Gawali, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Due to Inordinate Delay and Non-Application of Mind — Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, Section 56. Externment order set aside as stale offences, acquittals ignored, and stereotype witness statements violated principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Kishor Rambhaoji Narad, challenged an externment order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Warora, under Section 56 of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Compliance with Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 — Failure to Supply In-Camera Statements and Inadequate Notice Period Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Santosh Raghunath Patil, challenged an externment order dated 20th September 2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone 2,...