Search Results for "impleadment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "impleadment"

842 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 842 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trust's Challenge to Impleadment of Legal Heir in Change Report Proceedings. Joint Charity Commissioner's Order to Implead Widow of Trust Founder's Son Upheld as Within Jurisdiction Under Section 41A of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

3 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dr. J. J. Magdum Trust, through its Vice Chairman, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 18th March 2025 passed by the lea...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Impleadment Order in Environmental Public Interest Litigation — Appellant Directed to Implead Local Residents as Parties in Writ Petition Challenging Closure of Fish Meal Factory. The court held that residents who had earlier sought closure of illegal industries were necessary parties and entitled to be heard in the subsequent writ petition filed by the industry.

12 Jun 2019

The appellant, M/S Yashaswi Fish Meal and Oil Company, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Partnership and Dismissal of Suit for Accounts. Court holds that mere sharing of profits does not establish a partnership under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, and that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of a partnership agreement.

27 Mar 2015

The appellant, Prem Kaliaandas Daryanani, filed a suit for dissolution of partnership and accounts against the respondents, alleging that they were pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Assignee in Execution Proceedings Despite Right of Pre-emption Claim. Assignee of share in suit property entitled to be brought on record under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, independent of pre-emption rights under consent terms.

16 Jul 2014

The applicant, Nipun Thakkar, filed Chamber Summons No. 524 of 2013 seeking impleadment as a party in Execution Application (L) No. 370 of 2012 in Sui...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Co-Owner in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Co-Owner Held to be Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The court upheld the trial court's order allowing impleadment of a co-owner who allegedly obtained a trade licence by fraud, as his presence is essential for effective adjudication.

25 Mar 2014

The petitioners, Premanand Gajanan Naik and his wife Premila Premanand Naik, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.12.2013 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Delay Condonation Application in Company Appeal — Limitation Period Under Section 10F of Companies Act, 1956 Runs from Date of Knowledge of Order, Not from Receipt of Certified Copy. The court held that the right to receive a certified copy under Regulation 29(4) of CLB Regulations does not postpone the commencement of limitation, and the appeal filed beyond 120 days from the date of knowledge is barred.

11 Mar 2014

This judgment concerns a company application filed by Jagdish Lal Gupta, the appellant in an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Amendment of Plaint to Implead Subsequent Purchaser in Specific Performance Suit. Subsequent Purchaser Claiming Under Vendor is a Necessary Party and No Prejudice is Caused by Impleadment.

26 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from an order of a Learned Single Judge allowing a Chamber Summons for amendment of the plaint in a suit for specific performance. Th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Impleadment Order in Specific Performance Suit — Purchaser Pendente Lite Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Binds Transferee to Decree, Making Impleadment Unnecessary.

30 May 2013

The petitioner, Sri T.S. Mahadevaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 17.1.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Suit Challenging MHADA Notice. The court held that the petitioner, a company, was not a necessary or proper party to the suit between tenants and MHADA and had no right to be impleaded.

6 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Orbit Corporate Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9-2-2012 pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Succession and Title — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership. Succession Certificate Not Conclusive Proof of Title; Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right to Property.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Madhukar Venkatesh Ullal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking declaration of title and possession of a property. He claimed t...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)