Search Results for "gratuity scheme"

471 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 471 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to Voluntary Retiree with 17 Years Service Under General Insurance Pension Scheme. Supreme Court Precedent in Kirpal Singh Applied to Override 20-Year Qualifying Service Requirement.

The petitioner, Suhas Vinayak Sohoni, was appointed as a Development Officer in the National Insurance Co. Ltd. on 10 February 1985. After completing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Lumpsum Compensation to Part-time Sweeper with 41 Years of Service in Lieu of Regularization and Retiral Benefits. Court held that in absence of absorption policy and due to abolition of posts, lumpsum compensation of Rs.7,50,000 is appropriate in lieu of all service benefits.

The petitioner, Parasram Ranganath Gaikwad, worked as a Part-time Sweeper in the Veterinary Hospital of Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, from 7 June 1983 u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Teacher Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary from Gratuity. Recovery of Rs.1,39,316/- Set Aside as Payment Was Due to Departmental Error Without Misrepresentation by Employee.

The petitioner, Ashok Buchayya Pusalwar, was an Assistant Teacher with the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, appointed on 24-10-1996. He voluntarily retired...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Bank Employees' Union; Quashes Recall Order Denying Compensation. Employees Who Opted for Voluntary Retirement Before Bank Liquidation Held Entitled to Payment as Employment Relationship Continues Until Full Settlement.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a trade union representing 55 employees of Solapur Nagari Audyogic Saha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Leave Encashment Dispute — Recovery of Mistaken Payment from Gratuity Held Unjust. Petitioner's Leave Encashment Payment Was Not Mistaken as Government Resolution Did Not Apply to Non-Teaching Staff of Social Work Colleges.

The petitioner, Prakash Suryabhanji Ninghot, was appointed as a Peon on 01.10.1982 with respondent 5-College, a 100% grant-in-aid Social Work college....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Employee Seeking Modification of Annuity Option Under Post-Retirement Benefit Scheme. Option Once Exercised Under Super Annuation Benefit Fund Scheme Cannot Be Changed After Retirement, as It Would Affect Contractual Rights of Corporation and LIC.

The petitioner, Avinash Trimbak Namjoshi, was an employee of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Respondent No.1) who joined on 22nd June 1966 and opted for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...