Search Results for "fiduciary capacity"

146 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 146 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Share Valuation, Awards Interest at 6% Pre-Decree and 9% Post-Decree in Decades-Old Dispute. Balancing Equity and Commercial Realities: SC Modifies Interest Rates in Rajasthan State Mines Share Acquisition Case

Valuation of Shares – The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court’s valuation of shares at ₹640 per share, rejecting the State’s objections. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment in Partition Suit — Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial Disallowed as It Would Change Nature of Suit Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC

The petitioner, Raju Danchand Bardia, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 13th October 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; failure to show loan in income tax returns does not invalidate legally enforceable debt.

The appellant, Pushpa Sanchalal Kothari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquitt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Failure to Establish Criminal Intent Under Section 420 IPC. Allegations of Fraud in Real Estate Transaction Found to Be Purely Civil in Nature, Lacking Ingredients of Criminal Breach of Trust or Cheating.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had dismissed the appellants' petition to quash criminal pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave for Representative Suit in Tata Group Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that shareholders of different listed companies lack the same interest required under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC.

The Plaintiffs, claiming to be shareholders of various listed companies of the Tata Group, filed a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...