Search Results for "extra commercial consideration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "extra commercial consideration"

391 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 391 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Entertainment License for Orchestra in Restaurant, Quashes Rejection Based on Unsubstantiated Police Objections. The court held that the Commissioner of Police cannot reject an entertainment license application solely on the ground of potential law and order issues without concrete evidence of past violations or adverse reports.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Shivaji Sambu Waghralkar, sole proprietor of M/s Hausa Restaurant & Bar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...

High Court

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

24 Feb 2026

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Decrees on Grounds of Unauthorized Subletting, Bonafide Requirement, and Default in Rent Payment. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on unauthorized subletting, bonafide requirement, and default under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 were upheld as no jurisdictional error was found.

11 Oct 2024

The dispute pertains to eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord-respondent against the tenant-petitioners in respect of a shop premises in Kolh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

29 Apr 2024

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

6 Feb 2020

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

High Court

High Court Quashes Recovery Notices in VAT Case Due to Lack of Proper Service and Limitation. Notices under Section 45 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for arrears of tax, penalty, and interest for 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 quashed as they were issued without proper service and after unreasonable delay.

21 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Gayathri Projects Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging three notices is...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Gratuity Award in Public Trust Case. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applies to public trusts registered under Bombay Public Trust Act, and establishment coverage depends on employing more than ten employees.

18 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Amravati Nagar Vachanalaya, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, challenged the order of the Additional Commis...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)