Search Results for "executable decree"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "executable decree"

380 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

3 Mar 2017

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree Holder's Appeal Against Dismissal of Execution Petition for Non-Prosecution — Restoration Granted on Grounds of Sufficient Cause. The court held that the executing court erred in dismissing the execution petition for default and refusing restoration, as the decree holder had shown sufficient cause for non-appearance.

19 Dec 2019

The appellant, Basavaraj S/o Shamrao Sinigond, as the legal representative of the original decree holder Chandamma, filed a writ appeal against the or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtors' Motion to Set Aside Insolvency Notice Based on SFC Act Order. Order under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 is a decree or order within Section 9(2) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 and is executable against guarantors.

20 Jul 2015

The case involves two notices of motion filed by judgment debtors (Vikram Saboo and Shalini Saboo) seeking to set aside an insolvency notice issued by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Debt Recovery Matter — Debt Recovery Tribunal's Decree Constitutes a Final Judgment Under Section 9(2) of Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

3 Apr 2006

The judgment debtor, Deepak Cochhar and another, filed a notice of motion seeking to set aside Insolvency Notice No. N/72 of 2004 issued by the Insolv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution Proceedings in Partition Suit — Decree Holder's Right to Execute Decree Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata. Execution Application Filed Within 12 Years Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963 is Maintainable.

19 Oct 2010

The petitioners, who were judgment-debtors in a partition suit, filed a Civil Revision Application challenging the order dated 16th April 2004 passed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Order on Writ Petition Challenging Compromise Decree and Execution Proceedings — Fraud and Non-Alienation Clause Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 Considered

10 Dec 2025

The petitioners, judgment debtors in a compromise decree, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit for Recovery of Possession - Sets Aside Summary Judgment and Decree for Eviction. The Court held that the plaint did not disclose a valid cause of action as it was based on ambiguous lease expiry and future events, making summary judgment under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 improper.

22 Sep 2022

The appeal arose from a civil suit for recovery of possession of a plot of land in Delhi. The appellant, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., operate...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Amendment in Final Decree Proceedings — Inclusion of Joint Family Property Permitted Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The court held that final decree proceedings are a continuation of the suit and amendment to include inadvertently omitted joint family property is permissible to avoid multiplicity of suits.

7 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Janaki, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 17.08.2012 passed by the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Suit Against Occupant Who Had Ejectment Decree Not Executed Due to Slum Areas Act. Section 19 of Slum Areas Act Does Not Make Such Occupant a 'Tenant' Under Delhi Rent Control Act, Allowing Suit for Possession on Trespass Ground.

5 Nov 1965

The appellant, Lakhmi Chand Khemani, was the tenant of a building in Delhi owned by one M. M filed a suit for ejectment and obtained a decree. While a...

High Court

High Court Modifies Ejectment Decree to Grant Six Months to Vacate, Subject to Payment Conditions and Contempt Undertaking. Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Accepted Based on Appellant’s Undertaking to Peaceably Vacate Premises by January 2021.

3 Jul 2020

The appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against a judgment and decree dated 02.12.2019 in Original Suit No.6814/201...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)