Search Results for "dissolution"

723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of 381 Days' Delay in Filing Appeal Against Divorce Decree — Wife's Ignorance of Ex-Parte Decree Constitutes Sufficient Cause. Delay condoned as wife was unaware of the decree and learned of it only during DV Act proceedings, and no prejudice caused to husband.

The present Civil Application was filed by the applicant-wife seeking condonation of 381 days' delay in filing the Family Court Appeal against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders in Suit Under Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in Findings of Courts Below.

The petitioner, M/s Columbia Hospital & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant No.9 in a suit filed by respondent No.1, M/s Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal in Divorce Case — Concurrent Findings of No Cruelty or Desertion Upheld. Allegations Under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Not Proven.

The appellant-husband, Satish Dhudku Halnor, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgment and decree dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Maintenance Proceedings Under Section 125 CrPC Due to Prior Decree for Restitution of Conjugal Rights and Abuse of Process. Husband's Petition for Restitution Granted, Wife's Failure to Comply Renders Maintenance Claim an Abuse of Process.

The applicant, Raju Rathod, husband of respondent no.1 Rekha, filed a criminal application under the inherent powers of the High Court seeking quashin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reason to Believe — Amount Received on Retirement from Partnership Firm Held to be Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax.

The petitioners, Prashant S. Joshi and Dattaram Shridhar Bhosale, were partners in a real estate development partnership firm. They retired from the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Receiver Appointment in Partnership Dissolution Suit. Partnership at will dissolved by notice; court receiver appointed to protect assets pending final adjudication.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed Civil Suit No. 887 of 1994 seeking a declaration that the partnership firm M/s. Athavale Dairy was dissolved ...