Search Results for "differential pay"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "differential pay"

380 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

7 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

8 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds OBC Reservation in All-India Quota Medical Seats — Constitutionality of Reservation for Backward Classes in State-Surrendered Seats Affirmed. Court holds that reservation in AIQ seats is permissible and does not violate the principle of merit, and that the executive can introduce reservation in AIQ seats without legislation.

20 Jan 2022

This judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions challenging the reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Economically Weaker Section (EWS)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act Maintainable on Limitation Issue Even When Valuation/Rate of Duty Not Disputed. The Court ruled that the question of limitation is a distinct legal issue not relating to assessment, valuation, or rate of duty, and thus appeals challenging only the time-bar aspect are maintainable before the High Court under Section 35G.

23 Dec 2021

The case arose from a Central Excise Appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Importer in Customs Classification and Valuation Dispute — Head End Equipment Classified Under CTH 8543 8999 and Software/Service Charges Included in Assessable Value. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the imported goods constituted a complete functional unit and that the appellant's mis-declaration of classification and value justified penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.

27 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notice Against Employee. Recovery of Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Employer's Mistake Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

7 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Quashing of Recovery Notice. Employer Cannot Recover Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Its Own Mistake in Granting Exemption from Departmental Examination.

7 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

24 Aug 2010

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981. Court holds that the Act and Rules are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires, but directs that Rule 36 regarding termination for unauthorised absence must be read down to include an opportunity of hearing.

13 Jan 2006

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Shikshak Pratishtaan and others, and Prof. Vithal Dhondu Wani and others, challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)