Search Results for "detention order quashed"

1113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Right to Representation and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 Was Not Communicated, Rendering Detention Illegal.

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Prathiba Talapati, wife of the detenu Sri. Dawood Nadaf, challenging the preventive detention order dated 03.06.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Court holds that the alleged offences do not affect public order and the delay vitiates the detention order.

The petitioner, mother of the detenue, challenged a detention order dated 03.03.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and the delay in passing the order vitiated the subjective satisfaction.

The petitioner, Samad Salim Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 3(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance — Single Criminal Case and In-camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Detention as 'Dangerous Person'

The petitioner, Arjun Balkrishna Sonavane, challenged a preventive detention order dated 12.10.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Detenu Granted Bail in One Case and Remanded in Another, Yet Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Likelihood of Release and Continued Dangerous Activity.

The petitioner, Mohammed Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Shaikh @ Mohd. Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider vital documents and exhibited casual approach.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Siraz Mohammed Sayyed, challenged a detention order dated 10 July 2015 passed under Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(i...