Search Results for "controlled industry"

154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Patil Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Police Patil Not a Public Servant Under Section 2(c) of the Act. Petitioner appointed under Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967 held not to be a public servant within meaning of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Atul Ramdas Dabare, was appointed as a Police Patil under the Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967. An FIR was registered against him ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Promotion Dispute Against Co-operative Bank — Bank Not 'State' Under Article 12. Employee's Claim for Promotion to Deputy Chief Officer Fails as Technical Cadre Employee Not Entitled to Consideration for General Cadre Post.

The appellant, Sudhir Chatarpal Kedar, a Civil Engineer, was appointed as Engineer/Officer Grade-I in the Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank in July ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Rule 106-B of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 Restricting Alcohol Content in Homoeopathic Medicines. The Court held that the rule is intra vires the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and not violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The Petitioner, Shrikrishna Homeo Pharmacy, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, carries on the business of manufactu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Possession of the Acquired Land Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Fakhruddin s/o Hyderali (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Mustafa Fakhruddin Ambawala) challen...