Search Results for "consumer protection"

661 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 661 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute, Holds Flat Purchasers as Consumers Under Consumer Protection Act Despite Subsequent Leasing. NCDRC Decision Reversed and Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants and Another against Respondents and Another -- The Court reversed the NCDRC's decision which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to 399-Day Delay — Condonation Denied for Lack of Sufficient Cause. Internal administrative delays and employee turnover held not sufficient to explain each day of delay under Section 51 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by SBI General Insurance Company Ltd. against an order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Orders Refund to Homebuyer in Vatika India Next Project - Consumer Protection Act Applies to Plot Allotment Despite Arbitration Clause - Deficiency in Service Established for Delayed Possession

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed a consumer complaint filed by Complainant( s) against Opp.Party(s) for deficiency in servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Housing Board Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cancellation of Registration — Limitation Bar Under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Applied. The Court held that the consumer complaint filed 11 years after cancellation was time-barred and the allottee was in default.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Rajasthan Housing Board against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Appointment of Full-Time Presidents for District Consumer Forums in Goa. Failure to appoint full-time Presidents violates the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and defeats its objectives.

The petitioner, Shri Arjun Virnodkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking a direction for the appointment of a full-time...