Search Results for "compensation apportionment"

417 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Writ Petition Challenging Section 28-A Award as Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy. Acquiring Body Cannot Seek Reference Under Section 28-A(3) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Not a 'Person Interested' and Is Barred by Section 50(2).

The Bombay High Court dealt with three writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited, the acquiring body for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased was 30-year-old earning Rs.6,000 per month; Tribunal's assessment of income and multiplier modified.

The appellants, original claimants in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.26 of 2011, filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated 23.10.2012 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimants' Cross-Objection for Enhanced Compensation Dismissed as Deceased Pedestrian Found 50% Negligent for Crossing Road Without Caution.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased Khajasab, who died in a road accident on 18-03...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Reference for Compensation for Mining Lease Rights in Land Acquisition. Mining Lessee Not Entitled to Separate Compensation for Loss of Mining Rights Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Pravinkumar Gosalia, was a mining lessee of certain lands in Quitol Village, Quepem Taluka, Goa. His father had obtained a mining leas...