Search Results for "commercial tenancy"

301 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 301 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Grants Decree for Possession and Arrears in Commercial Lease Dispute — Tenant Failed to Pay Rent and Vacate Premises. Landlord Entitled to Recovery of Possession, Rental Arrears, Damages for Use and Occupation, and GST with Interest at 18% Per Annum.

The plaintiff, Faisal Khan, filed a suit in the High Court of Judicature at Madras seeking recovery of possession of his commercial property located a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Tenancy Declaration Case — Exclusive Possession Not Established. Sub-tenancy claim fails as plaintiff failed to prove exclusive possession and landlord's consent under Section 115 CPC.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the original plaintiff, Bhagyashri Asho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute Based on Agreement to Sell and Possessory Rights. Court Restrains Defendant from Alienating Suit Property or Acting on Assignment Deed, Directs Plaintiff to Pay Accommodation Charges to Tenants.

The dispute pertains to a property known as 'Sharda Niwas' in Goregaon, Mumbai. The plaintiff, Jagdish Harkishan Sharma, claimed to have entered into ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Rent Default Case — Eviction Decree Restored. Tenant's failure to pay rent for over six months constitutes wilful default under Section 22(2)(a) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

The petitioners, landlords of a commercial premises, sought eviction of the respondent tenant on the ground of default in payment of rent under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Family Property Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on possession and tenancy rights upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Anil Sital Hansrajani and another, who are brothers and sons of the respondent Sital T. Hansrajani, filed a petition under Section 34...