Search Results for "cinema house"

133 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was filed by the appellants (legal representatives of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Claim for Damages Against Tenant Holding Over After Termination of Tenancy. Tenant's Continued Possession After Self-Termination Constitutes Unauthorized Occupation, Entitling Landlord to Mesne Profits Under Section 108(h) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The case involves a second appeal by the plaintiffs, owners of a house property at Ausa, which was let out to the Nizam Government and later handed ov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Suit Against Film 'Baaghi' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Works. The court held that similarities were at the level of general ideas, not protectable expression under the Copyright Act, 1957.

The Plaintiffs, XYZ Films LLC, PT Merantau Films, and Sikhya Entertainment Private Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against UTV Motion Pic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Film Finance Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Established. Court Holds That Arbitration Agreement Existed via IMPPA Rules, Notice Was Properly Served, and Award Did Not Exceed Claim.

The petitioner, Mr. Gaurang Doshi, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bajirao @ Ramesh Suresh Kodre, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Raju @ Chandrashekhar P...