Search Results for "capital reconstruction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "capital reconstruction"

155 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 155 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Payment of Provident Fund Dues from Bank Sale Proceeds. Section 11(2) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 creates a first charge over assets of the establishment, overriding the claims of a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act.

16 Jun 2026

The petitioner, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint Against Directors in Commercial Suit -- No Cause of Action Against Nominee Director and Other Directors -- Corporate Personality Principle Upheld

5 Feb 2026

The Bombay High Court allowed Notices of Motion filed by Defendant Nos. 3 to 8 seeking rejection of the Plaint -- The Plaintiff had sued Defendants an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tata Memorial Centre's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Finding on Appropriate Government. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for Autonomous Body Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, Making Union's Complaint Maintainable.

20 Mar 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed four writ petitions filed by Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) challenging decisions of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which h...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in SARFAESI Act Recovery Case, Reiterates Limited Scope of Article 226 in Private Financial Disputes. The Court held that the High Court cannot entertain writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act actions when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available, and the interim arrangement by the Supreme Court did not confer jurisdiction to decide merits after DRT became functional.

17 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals by a lender bank against orders of the Kerala High Court that entertained writ petitions filed by borrowers (respondents) ch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 80-IB for Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts. Court Held That Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts Are Profits Derived From Business Under Section 80-IB of Income Tax Act, 1961, as They Reimburse Manufacturing and Exporting Costs, Following Meghalaya Steels Limited and Topman Exports Precedents.

10 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by an assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting wooden handicraft items, against ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Assumes Suo Motu Jurisdiction to Address COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis in Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services. The Court directed the Union of India to report on coordination, allocation, and management of oxygen, essential drugs, vaccination, and medical infrastructure under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, emphasizing a bounded-deliberative approach without usurping executive roles.

30 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court of India initiated a suo motu writ petition in response to the unprecedented humanitarian crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

4 Jul 2012

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging BIFR Order in SICA Reference — Holds That BIFR Cannot Reopen a Duly Sanctioned Scheme Without Jurisdiction Under Section 18 of SICA. The court quashed the BIFR order reopening a sanctioned scheme, ruling that the BIFR lacks inherent powers to review or modify a final scheme under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.

25 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, challenged an order dated 25.1.2011 passed by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Demerger and Restructuring of Nocil Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956. Court Approves Demerger of Petrochemicals and Polymer Division and Plastic Products Division into Two Separate Companies, Subject to Conditions Including Employee Protection and Compliance with Accounting Standards.

8 Jun 2005

The Bombay High Court considered three company petitions filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, by National Organic Chemical Indu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI Circular Excluding Primary Cooperative Credit Societies from Deposit Insurance Coverage. Circular dated 22.02.2008 Held Valid as It Merely Clarifies Existing Definition Under Section 2(g) of DICGC Act, 1961.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by cooperative credit societies challenging a circular dated 22.02.2008 issued by the Reserve Bank of I...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)