Search Results for "bootleggers"

316 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act Due to Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Subjective Satisfaction of Detaining Authority Vitiated as Statements Not Independently Verified.

The petitioner, Sourabh Kalu Koli, challenged an order of detention dated 7th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Kolhapur (Respondent No.2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Bootlegging Without Public Order Disturbance. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Law and Order Violations; Nexus to Public Order Must Be Established.

The petitioner, Rajendrasingh Bavari, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18.02.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Relevant Documents Not Supplied.

The petitioner, Jitendra @ Tiger Umaji Pawar, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Evidence Linking Detenu to Offences. Detenu's Name Not in FIRs and In-camera Statements Not Verified by Competent Authority.

The petitioner, Santosh Subhash Koli, through his mother Sunandabai Subhash Koli, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Establish Detriment to Public Order.

The petitioner, Nilesh Sunil Pendulkar, challenged an order dated 06.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar, under Section 3(1) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Compelling Necessity and Proximate Link. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider alternative remedies like cancellation of bail and there was unexplained delay, vitiating the order.

The petitioner, Aniket Balaji Suryawanshi, challenged an order dated 25.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Hingoli, detaining him under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...