Search Results for "binding instruction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "binding instruction"

334 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 334 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Tags Civil Appeals and Transfer Cases on Inter Se Seniority Between Direct Recruit and Promotees in Income Tax Department. Core Question is Whether Seniority of Direct Recruits Should be Based on Date of Appointment or Date of Vacancy.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals and transfer cases concerning the inter se seniority dispute between direct recruits and pro...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Procedure Code Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review Petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC fails as petitioner seeks re-argument on merits, not review of error.

16 Dec 2025

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav, delivered a CAV order on 16.12.2025 in Review Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition by Receiver in Slum Rehabilitation Matter — Petition Concerns Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Private Developers Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971; No Legal Holding Discernible from the Extracted Text.

23 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Plot Allotment and Forfeiture by CIDCO — Directs Issuance of Demand Letter for Second Installment with Late Payment Charges. The court held that the cancellation was arbitrary and violative of legitimate expectation, as CIDCO itself had sought relaxation of time limits under Regulation 15 of the New Bombay Disposal Land Regulations, 1975, which was approved by the State Government.

10 Sep 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Trishul Construction Co., was allotted three plots by CIDCO (respondent No.1) in 2007. The payment schedule required a first inst...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Architect's Petition Challenging Nomination to Council of Architecture; Holds State's Discretion Absolute Under Section 3(3)(f) of Architects Act, 1972. Nomination of Member from State under Architects Act requires no interview or selection criteria; Court cannot interfere with policy decision under Article 226.

8 Feb 2023

The petitioner, an architect with a master's degree from the United States, claimed to be highly qualified and sought nomination as a member of the Co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Against Summons for Offence Under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 for Alleged Violation of Rule 79-A(b) of Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Director Argues Lack of Vicarious Liability and Procedural Flaws, but Full Order Not Available.

22 Jul 2022

The revision petition was filed by a director of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing beverages, seeking to qua...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Disability Certificate Issued by Medical Board in BEST Employee Case. The Court held that the employer cannot challenge the disability certificate without independent evidence, and the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is not maintainable.

12 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Review Application in Service Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review of dismissal of writ petition challenging non-consideration of claim for correction of date of birth rejected as review not an appeal in disguise.

18 Dec 2017

The applicant, Taterao s/o Mahadu Bagul, an Additional Collector in Nandurbar, filed a review application (Stamp No.22202 of 2016) before the High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice and Order in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Stators and Rotors of Hermetic Motors Classifiable as Parts of Electric Motors, Not Compressors. Approved Classification Lists Cannot Be Reopened Without Fresh Material Under Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

23 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged a show cause notice dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction in Bank Guarantee Dispute — Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract Confers Jurisdiction on Chennai Courts. Plaintiff L&T's Suit Challenging Invocation of Performance Bank Guarantee Dismissed as Bombay High Court Has No Territorial Jurisdiction.

29 Feb 2016

The plaintiff, Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the invocation of a Performance Bank Gu...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)