Search Results for "benefit of doubt"

1655 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1655 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anjalappa and Ashok, were convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in S.C. No.322/2012 for the murder of a person unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Chain of Circumstances and Motive.

The appellant, Ranganatha T., was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga in S.C. No. 15/2015 for the murder of his wife u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kolar, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sakre Bosaiah, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, in Sessions Case No. 53/2009 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Age Determination. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC set aside as victim's age not proved beyond reasonable doubt and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged rape.

The appellant, Manikanta @ Puli, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in Spl.C.(PCSOA) No.10/2017 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Section 326 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapon set aside as prosecution failed to prove intention or knowledge beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Junaid B, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangaluru in S.C. No. 2/2012 for an offence under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, P. Yuvaprakash, was convicted by the trial court and the Madras High Court for offenses under Section 366A IPC and Section 6 of the POC...