Search Results for "army rules"

192 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 192 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Service Law Seniority Dispute Based on Select Panel Merit. Seniority of Direct Recruits Determined by Order of Merit in Select Panel Under DoPT OM Dated 3 July 1986, Not Date of Joining, as 1971 Rules Were Silent on Inter-Se Seniority for Combined All India List.

The dispute arose from the Military Engineering Service, where candidates were selected in 1983 for Superintendent posts across five Commands but some...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Double Punishment for Furlough Overstay — No Violation of Double Jeopardy as Remission Cut and Non-Reappointment as Convict Overseer Are Not Punishments Under Prison Rules.

The petitioner, Wilson Benjamin Castellino, a convict, was released on furlough on 19.11.2010 and was required to surrender on 4.12.2010. He failed to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order That Quashed Labour Court's Decision on Date of Birth Correction. Employer Cannot Unilaterally Change Employee's Date of Birth Without Following Proper Procedure and Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioner, Sonabai Harchand Gurav, was employed as a Gramsevika with the Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar, on 14.01.1977. Her date of birth was recorded...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Employees Against Air India for Failure to Accept Resignations. Employer Cannot Refuse Resignation or Force Employee to Continue Service Under Air India Certified Standing Orders.

The petitioners were employees of Air India Limited (respondent no.2) whose services were transferred to Air India Engineering Services Limited (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Uxoricide Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dipchand Pawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner for the murder of his wife Kalpanabai under Section 302 IPC and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition Alleging Double Jeopardy in Prison Punishment and Transfer. Transfer of prisoner to Special Prison does not require prior court approval and forfeiture of remission for misconduct is not double jeopardy.

The petitioner, Niyaj Ahamad Abdul Jabbar, a convict lodged in Open Prison, Morshi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpu...