Search Results for "amendment prospective"

627 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 627 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Insurance Nomination Dispute — Nominee Cannot Override Succession Rights Under Hindu Succession Act. Section 39 of Insurance Act, 1938 does not confer absolute title on nominee; nominee holds policy benefits as trustee for legal heirs.

The case involves a dispute between the appellant, Smt. Neelavva @ Neelamma, and the respondents, Smt. Chandravva @ Chandrakala @ Hema and her minor s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Legal Representatives to Continue Appeal Under Section 166(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166(5) Held Retrospective, Applies to Pending Appeals Where Claimant Died Before Amendment.

The case involves two appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 07.03.2011 in MVC Nos.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Hindu Succession Case — Daughter Entitled to Equal Share in Ancestral Property. Court holds that a married daughter is a coparcener under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and notional partition cannot defeat her rights.

The case involves a dispute over ancestral properties between a sister (respondent/plaintiff) and her brother's family (appellants/defendants). The re...