Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "admission outside pleadings"
231 result(s) found
Found 231 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Against Eviction Decree for Unlawful Subletting and Structural Alterations. Lease Deed Did Not Confer Right to Sublet Without Landlord's Consent; Subletting to Associate Companies and License to Third Party Constituted Unauthorized Subletting Under Section 108(o) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
12 Nov 2024The case involves a dispute over the eviction of tenants from a godown in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd., owned Godown No. 63 and leased...
- 425
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Specific Performance of Unregistered Draft Supplemental Agreement. Court Holds That a Draft Agreement with Blank Material Terms Cannot Be Enforced as a Contract, and the Arbitrator's Findings Were Patently Illegal and Manifestly Arbitrary.
25 Jun 2024The case involves two Commercial Appeals (90 of 2020 and 91 of 2020) arising from an Arbitral Award dated 14th February 2017, which was set aside by a...
- 367
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Registration of Deed Case — Execution of Sale Deed by Power of Attorney Holder Without Proper Authorization Set Aside. Court holds that a power of attorney holder cannot execute a sale deed without express authority and that the deed must be registered in accordance with the Registration Act, 1908.
11 Jan 2024The case involves a Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court. The dispute pert...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit and Upholds Wills in Family Property Dispute. Wills and Codicils Executed by Testator and Testatrix Found Valid, No Undue Influence or Lack of Testamentary Capacity Established.
22 Aug 2019The judgment concerns a family dispute over the estate of Chimanlal Chinai and his wife Shardaben Chinai. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of Dinkar Chinai...
- 114
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana — Rule 24(i-eeee) Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914. State Government's Exclusive Power Under Section 58(2)(e) to Regulate Licenses in Local Areas Cannot Be Delegated to Financial Commissioner.
12 Feb 2019The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970, as amended ...
- 258
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana. Rule 24(i-eeee) of Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914 as State Government Cannot Delegate Power to Determine Number of Licenses for Entire State.
12 Feb 2019The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 (as amended ...
- 223
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal Against Consent Divorce Terms, Directs Execution of Consent Terms for Divorce by Mutual Consent Under Section 28 of Special Marriage Act, 1954. Husband Cannot Resile from Consent Terms After Wife Agreed to All Conditions Including Withdrawal of Allegations and Acceptance of Maintenance.
15 Oct 2016The case involves a husband (Suresh Bhandary) who filed an appeal against a Family Court order granting divorce by mutual consent on certain terms. Th...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Change of User from Residential to Commercial. Tenant's Use of Premises for Storing Cloth Packages and Business Constitutes Change of User Under Rent Control Legislation.
18 Mar 2013The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (tenants) challenging the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate C...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Under Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act. Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Invoking Section 33C(2) and Cannot Be Decided as Incidental Issue.
19 Jan 2005The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitio...
- 102
