Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

714 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 714 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession. Suit for Permanent Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff's Possession Not Established and Title Not Proven, Relief of Declaration Not Sought.

The appellant, Smt. Sabiha Banu R, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree-Holder's Execution Against Pendente Lite Purchaser in Possession Suit. Held that a purchaser pendente lite is bound by the decree and can be dispossessed in execution under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC without a separate suit.

The petitioner, Kashinath Ramji Shinde (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a suit in 1987 seeking possession, declaration, and mesne p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal in Title Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property. Declaration of Title Denied as Sale Deed Did Not Contain Approved Layout Plan and Plaintiff Failed to Establish Continuous Possession.

The appellant, T.S. Krishnamoorthy, filed an appeal against the dismissal of his suit O.S. No. 13520 of 2010 by the VII Additional Judge, City Civil C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Son's Challenge Against Impleadment of Parents in Property Suit — Order Directing Addition of Parents as Parties Set Aside. Court holds that parents have no independent right to be impleaded in son's suit for possession against third parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Parag Prakash Mutha, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 January 2022 passed by the 7th Additional Judge, Small Causes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Specific Performance Decree in Land Sale Agreement Dispute. Trial Court's Discretion to Enhance Sale Consideration Upheld as Plaintiff Demonstrated Readiness and Willingness Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from an agreement to sell dated 07.08.2005, where the defendants agreed to sell land to the plaintiff for Rs. 8,750 per cent, with a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Stop Work Notice and Demolition Order in Cantonment Area — Holds That Repair of Old Grant Bungalow Does Not Require Prior Permission Under Revised Land Policy of 1995.

The petitioners, legal heirs of late Smt. Homai Nussarwanji Pudumjee, were occupancy holders of bungalow No.6, Maneckji Mehta Road, Pune, an old grant...