Search Results for "Talathi"

201 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 201 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Order Directing Collector to Treat Writ Petition as Representation. Court held that the order was complied with by the Collector's decision, and no willful disobedience was established.

The petitioners, Thaksen Waman Davale and others, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, including Subhas D. Sonawane and others, wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice Against Project-Affected Employee in Land Misrepresentation Case. Policy Interpretation Under Section 2(2)(c)(i) of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 Favours Petitioner as Only Land Left After Acquisition Considered.

The petitioners, Kundlik s/o Kosru Mate and his son Sharad s/o Kundlik Mate, filed a writ petition challenging a show-cause notice dated 15.03.2002 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Tax Collector in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. Demand of Illegal Gratification for Issuing Tax Demand Notice Proved Through Trap and Recovery of Tainted Currency Notes.

The appellant, Dayaram s/o Balram Kuthe, was a Tax Collector with the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. The complainant, Dharamraj Natthuji Madankar, cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Family Settlement Mutation Entry Not Attracting Criminal Offences Under IPC Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 r/w 34.

The applicant, Smt. Linabai @ Pramilabai Dhivare, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Section 6 Declaration Issued Beyond One Year from Last Publication of Section 4 Notification Invalidates Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Riva Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and its director Vishwanath Balaram Naik Palyekar, challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Under Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Petitioners Failed to Show Statutory Violation or Arbitrariness in Acquisition Process.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their land for widening of the Aurangabad-Jalna road und...