Search Results for "Shareholders"

629 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 629 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Order Rejecting Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Upheld. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Law Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (M/s New Shelter Enterprises and its proprietors) challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 'C' Summary Report in Cheating Case — Directs Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Court finds that the investigating officer failed to examine crucial documents and witnesses, rendering the summary report premature and based on incomplete investigation.

The petitioner, Dharmil Anil Bodani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CLB Order on Share Transmission in Company Dispute. CLB's findings on oppression and mismanagement under Sections 397 and 398 of Companies Act, 1956 set aside due to lack of evidence.

The judgment concerns multiple company appeals arising from orders of the Company Law Board (CLB) in relation to Mehboob Productions Pvt. Ltd., a comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Thirteen Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from shareholders or creditors.

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a scheme of amal...