Search Results for "Shareholder"

390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Appoint Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Respondent's Limitation Objection Rejected as Debt Acknowledged Within Limitation Period, Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator.

The petitioner, Oil Field Instrumentation India Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Company Dispute Under Companies Act and IPC -- Civil Nature and Statutory Bar Upheld

The Supreme Court allowed criminal appeals filed by Yerram Vijay Kumar and Rajeev Kumar Agarwal against the State of Telangana and others, quashing cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Consent Order in Company Oppression Case — Parties Bound by Consensus. Consent order for share buyout under Sections 397-398 of Companies Act, 1956 cannot be challenged by consenting party.

The case involves an appeal filed by Shalby Limited and others against an order dated 25.04.2016 passed by the Company Law Board (CLB), New Delhi Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CLB Order on Share Transmission in Company Dispute. CLB's findings on oppression and mismanagement under Sections 397 and 398 of Companies Act, 1956 set aside due to lack of evidence.

The judgment concerns multiple company appeals arising from orders of the Company Law Board (CLB) in relation to Mehboob Productions Pvt. Ltd., a comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Against Hubtown Ltd. Based on Bona Fide Dispute of Debt. Corporate Guarantee Enforcement Requires Prima Facie Case of Default and Absence of Substantial Dispute Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Hubtown...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...