Search Results for "Section 487"

220 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 220 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Admission of Documents in Partition Suit — Secondary Evidence Permitted Under Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Documents Held Admissible as Certified Copies of Public Records or Where Plaintiff Failed to Produce Originals After Notice.

The suit was filed by Indira Rajguru against her brothers and sister for partition and declaration of rights in respect of properties. The matter came...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit in Family Property Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to 1/5th Share. Co-owner's Right to Partition Upheld Despite Unproven Allegations of Oral Partition and Will.

The suit was filed by Indira Rajguru, a resident of the United Kingdom, against her brothers and sister (defendants) for partition and separate posses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Admissibility of Documents in Suit for Partition and Declaration of Rights. Documents not proved in accordance with Indian Evidence Act, 1872 cannot be admitted in evidence unless original is produced or foundation for secondary evidence is laid.

The suit was placed before the court for considering the admissibility of documents referred to and relied upon by defendant nos.3 and 4 in their comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...