Search Results for "Section 401 CrPC"

223 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 223 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Applicant Not Named in FIR in Cheating Case — Statement of Co-Accused Insufficient to Implicate Without Independent Material. Applicant Implicated Solely on Basis of Co-Accused's Statement Under Sections 409, 420, 120B IPC; FIR Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR registered with Salabatpura Polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 395 and 397 IPC based solely on testimony of sole interested witness without corroboration held unsustainable.

The petitioners, accused Nos.2, 3 and 5, were convicted by the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Madhugiri in C.C.No.957/2009 for offences punishable u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Parties — Compromise Reached Under Section 482 CrPC Allows Quashing of Non-Compoundable Offences to Secure Ends of Justice.

The petitioners, including the husband Firasat Khan and his relatives, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceeding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case, Reduces Fine Amount. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding cheque issued for repayment of loan.

The case arises from a complaint filed by M/s. Meenakshi Developers (respondent/complainant) against Sri V.V. Chari (petitioner/accused) under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Corruption Case — Discharge Granted Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Petitioner, a public servant, was entitled to discharge as the prosecution failed to obtain valid sanction for prosecution.

The petitioner, a public servant, was accused in a corruption case before the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He filed an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Leave to Appeal by First Informant in Motor Accident Case — First Informant Not a 'Complainant' Under Section 378(4) CrPC. Victim Who Was Driver of Fire Tender Cannot Maintain Appeal Against Acquittal as He Was Not the Complainant in the Trial.

The applicant, Damodar Pednekar, was the driver of a fire tender involved in an accident with a motorcycle driven by the accused, Umakant Naik. The ap...