Search Results for "Section 376(D) IPC"

90 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The petitioner, Mehul @ Chilu S/o Ramvilas Gupta, was preventively detained by an order dated 19.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The petitioner, Shabbir @ Bidi S/o Mohammad Shekh, was preventively detained by an order dated 19.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Ibraham @Gandi Kadarbhai Meman, was preventively detained by an order dated 07.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Rahul@Mansik Surendrasinh Vaghela, through his friend Mittal Dashrathsinh Parmar, challenged the preventive detention order dated 28.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The petitioner, Sagar @ Saglo Kantilal Kavaji Gameti, was preventively detained by an order dated 07.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmeda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Nirmalsing Rajendrasing Tank Chikhligar, through his father Rajendrasing Ratansing Chikhligar, challenged a preventive detention order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance to public order.

The petitioner, Nikhil Bharatbhai Lakum, was preventively detained by an order dated 08.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Bail for Gang Rape Accused Despite 3-Year Incarceration, Citing Prima Facie Evidence and Seriousness of Offence Under Section 376(D) IPC. Speedy Trial Violation Claim Rejected as Charge Framed and Trial to Be Expedited.

The applicant, Nitesh Raghunath Lahange, filed a second bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release in connection with Crime No. I-1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals and Upholds Conviction in Gang Rape Case Under Sections 363 and 376(D) IPC. DNA Analysis of Undergarment Stains Proved Guilt of All Four Accused, Trivializing Contradictions in Victim’s Narration and Test Identification Failures.

Background: The appeals arose from the conviction of four men by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, in Special Criminal (Child) Case No. 14 of 2...