Search Results for "Section 304A IPC"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Revision in Rash Driving Case, Maintains Conviction but Reduces Sentence for Aged Accused. Conviction under Section 304A IPC for causing death by rash and negligent driving upheld, but sentence reduced to period already undergone due to age and health of accused.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Dakaram Bhojraj Khotele, a bus driver, against his conviction by the Judicial Magistrate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction of Driver in Rash Driving Death Case. Accused driver convicted under Sections 279 and 304A IPC for causing death of pedestrian due to rash and negligent driving; conviction under Section 134 r/w 187 MV Act also affirmed.

The revision petitioner, Kallappa S/o Bhimappa Sutagannavar, was the accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident on 17.05.2012 at about 2....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Converts Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Celebratory Firing Case — Appellant's Act of Firing Gun at Roof During Marriage Ceremony Lacked Intention to Kill, Attracts Section 304 Part II IPC

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the conviction of Bhagwan Singh under Sections 302 and 307 IPC for causing the death of two persons and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A IPC Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses -- Conviction Overturned and Acquittal Restored

The appellant was convicted by the first appellate court under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for rash and negligen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Identity and Negligence. Concurrent Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Accused Was Driver of KSRTC Bus Involved in Fatal Accident.

The petitioner, Chand Basha, was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bellary, in C.C. No. 165 of 2007 for offences punishable under Sections 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rash Driving Death Case — Conviction Under Section 304A IPC Upheld. Evidence of Eye-Witnesses and Medical Reports Establish Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Moulasab, challenging his conviction and sentence by the JMFC-I, Hubli in CC N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the bus driver was driving rashly or negligently at the time of accident.

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Deepak s/o Motiramji Bhoge, a driver employed with M.S.R.T.C., challenging his convictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Sets Aside Conviction in Fatal Jeep Accident Case Due to Unproven Medical Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. The court held that reversal of acquittal was unjustified when post-mortem report was not proved and only one eyewitness supported the prosecution.

The applicant, Anita Sopan Ravalekar, was initially acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhor, for offences under Sections 279, 304A, 337...