Search Results for "Section 167 CrPC"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case for Non-Filing of Chargesheet Within 90 Days. Section 167(2) CrPC Default Bail Entitlement Not Extinguished by Subsequent Filing of Chargesheet After Application.

The petitioners, seven individuals arrested in connection with Crime No.47/2022 for offences under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148 read with Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in MPID Act Case Due to Chargesheet Not Taken Cognizance Within 90 Days. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues when the chargesheet is not taken cognizance within the prescribed period, even if physically filed earlier.

The applicant, Wasudeo Shrawan Kamble, was arrested on 13 July 2020 in connection with Crime No. 427/2020 registered at Police Station Ballarshah, Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Long Incarceration. Accused Not Named in FIR and No Direct Evidence of Involvement Under Section 302 IPC.

The petitioners, accused Nos. 1 and 2, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Inspector in Abetment to Suicide Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Section 306 IPC. Allegations of Fabrication of Evidence Under Section 167 IPC Also Fail as No Material to Show Intent to Cause Suicide.

The applicant, Sainath Ramrao Thombre, a Police Inspector, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Extending Investigation Time and Rejecting Default Bail. Accused's contention that non-enclosure of Investigating Officer's report vitiated extension under Section 22(2)(b) of Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, 2000 rejected.

The High Court of Karnataka examined three criminal petitions filed by accused persons challenging the trial court's order dated 17.10.2025, which all...