Search Results for "Section 163-A"

182 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals as Fraudulent Due to Fabricated Vakalatnama and Forgery of Appellant's Signature. Court Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Advocates and Notary for Misusing Legal Process to File SLP Without Appellant's Consent.

The Supreme Court dealt with two appeals purportedly filed by Bhagwan Singh challenging a High Court order quashing criminal proceedings and a subsequ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Deceased was a gratuitous passenger in tractor used for transportation of goods; insurer liable to pay compensation despite breach of policy conditions.

The appellant, Kanta @ Baby w/o Dilip Bawankar, filed a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Negligence on Part of Deceased Driver. Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as Tribunal Correctly Applied Structured Formula Without Need to Prove Negligence.

The appeal was filed by the insurance company, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, challenging the judgment and award dated 09.05.2014 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case — Insurance Company Liable for Negligent Parking of Vehicle. Truck parked without indication on highway causing accident; insurer held jointly liable with owner for compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 13th March 2009, when the respondent no.1, a minor aged 10 years, was traveling in a Tata Magic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Cross-Objection and Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.1,80,000/- to Rs.3,34,000/- with 6% Interest.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of a deceased 20-year-old man who died in a road accident on 23-07-2007. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Parents of Deceased in Motor Accident Case — Multiplier Corrected from 13 to 14 and Future Prospects Added. The Court applied multiplier 18 based on deceased's age of 25 years and added 40% future prospects under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166.

This appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 30.07.2013 passed by the VI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Belagavi in MVC No.2503/2012, awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence Proved and Quantum Upheld. Deceased's Income Reduced to Rs.2,800 per Month but 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 18 Applied Correctly.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a deceased 25-year-old man who died in a vehicular accident. The claimants, Ramrao...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim. Multiplier Under Section 163A Motor Vehicles Act Must Be Based on Age of Deceased, Not Dependents.

The case involves an appeal by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. against an award of compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act,...