Search Results for "Retrenchment"

341 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 341 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Against Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam — Reinstatement with 30% Back Wages Upheld for Directly Engaged Gardeners. Termination During Conciliation Proceedings Violated Section 6E of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves appeals by workmen (Gardeners) and the employer (Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam) against a High Court judgment modifying Labour Court awards....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Remands for Fresh Adjudication on Punitive Termination. Punitive termination is not retrenchment under Section 2(oo) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Labour Court misapplied Sections 25F and 25G.

The petitioner, Nandura Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which had allowed the complaint of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Employer's Failure to Pay Full Wages and Notice Pay Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Retrenchment Invalid.

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) filed five writ petitions challenging separate awards of the Labour Court, Dhule,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Upheld as Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service. Labour Court's Finding of Fact Not Perverse, No Interference Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Keru Kisan Rokade, was initially appointed on a temporary basis by the respondent, Geoffery Manners & Co. Ltd., Nasik. Although his ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Retrenchment Case. Termination of Probationer Without Notice or Compensation Under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal as Employer Failed to Prove Unsatisfactory Work.

The Petitioner, M/s R. Nawroji & Co., a partnership firm running a printing press, appointed the First Respondent, Francis E. Lobo, as a Machine Opera...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee is already aware of the closure of the establishment.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Municipal Council, Tirora, and its President against common orders passed by the Labour C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions of Retrenched Employees Against Private Polytechnic for Lack of Maintainability. Employees of Private Aided Institution Not 'Workmen' Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Remedy Lies Before Civil Court or Labour Court Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by employees of Padmashree Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil Foundation's Polytechnic, a private aided institu...