Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
Search Results for "Reserve Forest"
101 result(s) found
Found 101 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses University's Appeal Against Single Judge Order in Service Matter — Interim Relief Granted to Teachers Upheld. Court holds that the principle of natural justice and the right to be heard must be observed before reverting teachers from in-charge positions, and that the University's action was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
14 Jul 2022The present appeals arise out of an interim order dated 04.12.2021 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka in W.P. No. 104236/...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition Declaring Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Award Made After Commencement of 2013 Act Without Taking Possession or Paying Compensation Results in Lapse of Proceeding.
10 Apr 2019The petitioners, owners of land Gat No. 176 in Khelbar, Jalgaon Jamod, challenged the land acquisition proceeding initiated under Section 6 notificati...
- 137
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Company Official in Cheating Case Due to Illegal Arrest and Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Arrest by Police Officers Not on Deputation Held Unconstitutional.
26 Sep 2018The petitioner, Sri Srinath Mangalore, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Despite Defective Arbitration Clause in Work Orders. Court Holds That Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, It Can Appoint Sole Arbitrator When Arbitration Agreement Is Invalid Due to Lack of Mechanism for Third Arbitrator.
16 Sep 2016The Applicant, Voltas Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole ar...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Wildlife Case Due to Lack of Authorized Complaint Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Police Constable Not a Competent Officer to Lodge Complaint Under Sections 9, 39, 50, 51 of the Act.
14 Jul 2015The petitioners, Mannu Kaduba Gavane and Sagar Mannu Gavane, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking qua...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).
29 Jan 2014The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MBBS Admission Under Hilly Area Reservation for Student Who Studied in Adjacent Hilly Tahsil. The court held that the requirement of studying in a hilly area is satisfied if the student studied in any hilly area, not necessarily the same village, and directed the State to grant admission.
20 Aug 2013The petitioner, Shubham Borekar, a resident of Semadoh, a hilly area in Amravati district, applied for MBBS admission under the hilly area reservation...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Ceiling Case — Natural Tank Area Included in Surplus Land Calculation. Land occupied by natural tank cannot be excluded from total holding under Section 21 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.
19 Jul 2006The appellants, Sou. Bhagyashreeraje w/o Shivajirao Dhanwatey and Shivajirao Vasantrao Dhanwatey, challenged the judgment of a learned Single Judge in...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging CRZ Clearances for Coastal Road Project — Upholds Environmental Clearance Validity. Court holds that CRZ notifications and environmental clearances for the Mumbai Coastal Road Project are valid and not in violation of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 or the CRZ Notification, 2011.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Yeshwanth Shenoy challenging the environmental and CRZ clearances granted for the...
- 78
