Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

917 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 917 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Main Offence Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

5 Mar 2020

The petitioner, father of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order dated 13th November 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Railway...

High Court

High Court Considers Challenge to Preventive Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, Alleging Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Detenu Argued Failure to Disclose Acquittals in Earlier Cases and Non-Supply of Vital Documents Vitiates the Detention Order’s Validity.

26 Mar 2013

The proceedings arose from a criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay Hig...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes PASA Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Preventive detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIR under Prohibition Act does not establish disturbance to public order.

12 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Rashikbhai Jinabhai Bambhoniya, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Gujarat High Court,...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance — Detenue's Past Offences Do Not Justify 'Dangerous Person' Classification Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The court held that mere registration of criminal cases without evidence of public order disturbance cannot sustain a preventive detention order under Section 2(c) of the Act.

5 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Rajnish @ Lambu S/o Rajubhai Rajbhar, was preventively detained by an order dated 27.12.2025 passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Act Case for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Detenu's Bail Status in Pending Criminal Cases.

3 May 2018

The petitioner, Kiran Dhanraj Kharat, challenged a detention order dated 13 December 2017 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under the Mahara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation by State Government. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the possibility of bail and the State Government mechanically confirmed the detention, rendering the orders unsustainable.

4 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Mohammed Mustafa, challenged the preventive detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad under Section 3(1) of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that the petitioner was already in custody and no credible material showed likelihood of release on bail.

10 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Mukesh Prakash Bhalerao, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 23rd January 2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgao...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives Renders Detention Unreasonable. Court held that the Detaining Authority must consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic measures like cancellation of bail or prosecution before ordering preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drugs Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981.

27 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Rakesh Mohan Gadekar, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses — Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated

28 Feb 2020

The petitioner, father of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order dated 17/10/2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order at Pre-Execution Stage Due to Non-Placement of Vital Documents and Gross Delay. The court held that the grounds for challenging a preventive detention order at pre-execution stage are not limited to the five grounds in Alka Subhash Gadia, and that non-placement of vital documents vitiates the order under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

5 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Surendra Kumar Pandey, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 4 July 2014 passed by the Additional Chief Secretary (Appeals...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)